This is a classic example of a negative externality: major tech companies earn huge profits while externalizing costs to rest of society (in terms of political & social impacts of widespread conspiracy theories, growing distrust of other media sources, discrimination, etc) https://t.co/gEhRf3DqsQ
— Rachel Thomas (@math_rachel) October 3, 2018
new post: I put together a list of resources about AI Ethics (including links to syllabi, experts to follow, institutes, fellowships, talks, articles, and more) https://t.co/imCVLwahvj
— Rachel Thomas (@math_rachel) September 24, 2018
I’m super proud of our data ethics policy, which begins with a shout-out to @philipmeyer4 whose foundational work on bringing the scientific method to journalism inspires our work https://t.co/wLWSK8opNl
— Julia Angwin (@JuliaAngwin) September 24, 2018
My @py_bay keynote on ethics & bias in AI includes both negative & positive case studies, common misconceptions about tech, and some healthier principles for thinking about ethics:https://t.co/2KiP4MNjKZ
— Rachel Thomas (@math_rachel) September 23, 2018
This is good. Google's Responsible AI Practices: https://t.co/M2gN8RvT5O
— Hilary Mason (@hmason) September 23, 2018
(via @mikeloukides)
“In a surveillance economy where companies […] capitalize on our clicks, the issue isn’t privacy. It’s unfettered data exploitation and its consequences: unequal consumer treatment, financial fraud, ID theft, manipulative marketing and discrimination.” https://t.co/0dOHi2RXse
— Angela Bassa (@AngeBassa) September 23, 2018
Scary: Google’s Chinese partner would be able to “selectively edit search result pages … unilaterally, and with few controls seemingly in place.”
— Gary Marcus (@GaryMarcus) September 22, 2018
≠ Don’t Be Evil. https://t.co/N5W9vp1oPc
We saw this coming, and here it is. Endless trapdoors ahead: data inaccuracies, intentional gaming, constant intimate surveillance 24/7, data breaches that will be infinitely worse, &c... https://t.co/0T7JJPWT0b
— Kate Crawford (@katecrawford) September 19, 2018
UK officials deemed it “too expensive” to remove the mugshots of innocent people from their databases https://t.co/XGM9saY7LE pic.twitter.com/csAQsDXgTR
— Rachel Thomas (@math_rachel) September 12, 2018
I hope you will to! Just out. It's *FREE* and creative commons lic.
— dj patil (@dpatil) September 9, 2018
If you like it give us a review. If we missed something, tell us. This is 0.1 release on a topic we all need to focus on https://t.co/08sfitiKJl
US has no federal laws on police use of automated facial analysis. #BigTech is taking advantage. @IBM contracted with @Microsoft subsidiary to provide video analytics for NYPD that can automate racial profiling. Halt/Regulate/Ban #FacePolicing? Another alternative? Weigh in. https://t.co/V9NByo0CPh
— Joy Buolamwini (@jovialjoy) September 7, 2018
I was glad to see Davey's article cover Facebook's Free Basics, which has played an important role in the Philippines https://t.co/YVVvuwvcqM
— Rachel Thomas (@math_rachel) September 5, 2018
