The GPT-3 hype is way too much. It’s impressive (thanks for the nice compliments!) but it still has serious weaknesses and sometimes makes very silly mistakes. AI is going to change the world, but GPT-3 is just a very early glimpse. We have a lot still to figure out.
— Sam Altman (@sama) July 19, 2020
I bet GPT-3 will be really good at generating business plans for startups using GPT-3
— Mark O. Riedl (@mark_riedl) July 20, 2020
Great work @sh_reya & @notsleepingturk on GPT-3 sandbox: https://t.co/xhAZ0faufP, a flexible tool for building OpenAI-powered apps. https://t.co/zeYmgvXBpj
— Greg Brockman (@gdb) July 25, 2020
It's out! The first @pagestlabs issue is on how to think about the buzz in breakthrough technologies like GPT-3 while living in the midst of it. Thanks everyone who subscribed early. Hope you like reading long posts 😅🖖https://t.co/Z6zFyK4CuI
— Delip Rao (@deliprao) July 26, 2020
GPT-3 and A Typology of Hype (by Delip Rao) https://t.co/4G5U0tHf0i
— /MachineLearning (@slashML) July 27, 2020
One of our users is running a rigorous test of OpenAI's utility in copywriting: https://t.co/G6TYXWUNxN.
— Greg Brockman (@gdb) July 29, 2020
You can sign up on the landing page if you'd like your site to participate.
Will be exciting to see the results!
Philosophers On GPT-3
— hardmaru (@hardmaru) July 31, 2020
“It has many limitations and its work is full of glitches and mistakes. But the point is not so much GPT-3 but where it is going. Given the progress from GPT-2 to GPT-3, who knows what we can expect from GPT-4 and beyond?”https://t.co/Rkz6IRueZm
The futurists predicted a singularity where AI recursively improves AI, but what we've got instead is AI feeding on text generated by AI. https://t.co/wpXCIZ1BA7
— Arvind Narayanan (@random_walker) August 1, 2020
An insightful essay probing to what extent GPT-3 is capable of making analogies. Recommended!https://t.co/LXWKVlCHt2 https://t.co/PRWmPMYD9q
— François Chollet (@fchollet) August 6, 2020
I'm not putting them on blast b/c they're a student, but I just ran across someone implying that GPT-3 correctly answered a medical question by using reasoning and underlying knowledge.
— Rachael Tatman (@rctatman) August 10, 2020
Language models simply do not do that. PLEASE don't use them for medical advice.
GPT-3 isn’t some super intelligent AI.
— Chris Albon (@chrisalbon) August 11, 2020
It is a language model desperately trying to say the right things so it fits in.
In today's disturbing news, I discovered that GPT-3 can write AI Weirdness blog posts.
— Janelle Shane (@JanelleCShane) August 17, 2020
1st paragraph is my prompt. The rest is GPT-3 handily simulating the fumbling of a much less powerful neural net.https://t.co/xOulehDuL8 pic.twitter.com/WHcWmvmUNv
