Homepage
Close
Menu

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Archive(TODO)
    • By Day
    • By Month
  • About(TODO)
  • Stats
Close
by xamat on 2019-07-17 (UTC).

Systematic analysis of many recent neural #recsys shows lack of reproducibility and poor performance even when compared to simple heuristics 😨 https://t.co/v2iPua3UMM

— Xavier 🎗️ (@xamat) July 17, 2019
research
by rctatman on 2019-07-29 (UTC).

Relevant to this blog post I wrote a while ago: https://t.co/lyw14bLMZc

Unfortunately it looks like even more evidence that common methods of ML algorithm evaluation have some pretty big flaws. 😢 https://t.co/qgQ3DTY6FF

— Rachael Tatman (@rctatman) July 29, 2019
researchmisc
by xamat on 2019-07-30 (UTC).

"On the Difficulty of Evaluating Baselines: A Study on Recommender Systems" [PAPER] #recsys https://t.co/4NqSfpP7al
"With a [...] vanilla MF [...], we are not only able to improve upon the reported results for this baseline but even outperform [...] any newly proposed method" 😱

— Xavier 🎗️ (@xamat) July 30, 2019
research

Tags

learning tutorial misc nlp rstats gan ethics research dataviz survey python tool security kaggle video thought bayesian humour tensorflow w_code bias dataset pytorch cv tip application javascript forecast swift golang rl jax julia gnn causal surey diffusion
© Copyright Philosophy 2018 Site Template by Colorlib