Homepage
Close
Menu

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Archive(TODO)
    • By Day
    • By Month
  • About(TODO)
  • Stats
Close
by johnmyleswhite on 2018-12-11 (UTC).

If you go further with this logic, I think you end up concluding that you should always focus on the full, raw dataset -- since you can only compress it effectively if you either (a) have a correct model or (b) don't mind loss. https://t.co/XzqSBIgPc9

— John Myles White (@johnmyleswhite) December 11, 2018
thought
by johnmyleswhite on 2018-12-11 (UTC).

I actually mostly agree with that claim because I think it puts the burden on acknowledging that most data analysis is just subjectively driven data compression -- all you generally get is the result of projecting your data onto some model space.

— John Myles White (@johnmyleswhite) December 11, 2018
thought
by richarddmorey on 2018-12-11 (UTC).

Yes, comment was made in the context of the p value vs confidence interval discussion (as if they were different methods, rather than different inferential summaries within the same method). Ideally we'd throw mult. models at a problem, & assess them from mult. perspectives.

— Richard D. Morey (@richarddmorey) December 11, 2018
thought

Tags

learning tutorial misc nlp rstats gan ethics research dataviz survey python tool security kaggle video thought bayesian humour tensorflow w_code bias dataset pytorch cv tip application javascript forecast swift golang rl jax julia gnn causal surey diffusion
© Copyright Philosophy 2018 Site Template by Colorlib