Homepage
Close
Menu

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Archive(TODO)
    • By Day
    • By Month
  • About(TODO)
  • Stats
Close
by AthertonKD on 2018-06-01 (UTC).

When Google pulls out of Project Maven, who is mostly likely to fill the void? My gut feeling is Amazon, since there seems to be little Amazon formally has qualms about, but maybe there's someone else interested in the gig.

— Kelsey D. Atherton (@AthertonKD) June 1, 2018
ethics
by Miles_Brundage on 2018-06-01 (UTC).

(from https://t.co/JCbduYt5eb) what does that even mean? Better ML for drone footage processing = 100x safer US troops? Umm

— Miles Brundage (@Miles_Brundage) June 1, 2018
ethics
by Miles_Brundage on 2018-06-01 (UTC).

This is why, if Google wants to be serious about ethics + AI, it should be involved in discussions of governing lethal autonomous weapons, etc. Not participating is insufficient if the goal is to make something not happen. https://t.co/3hyqGkAiXs

— Miles Brundage (@Miles_Brundage) June 1, 2018
ethics
by Miles_Brundage on 2018-06-01 (UTC).

I think Google’s voice could be quite influential in such debates and have a much broader impact. Alas, besides this leaked internal debate, the only loud voice they’re really giving off externally is Eric Schmidt’s hawkishness. Much more to be done.

— Miles Brundage (@Miles_Brundage) June 1, 2018
ethics

Tags

learning tutorial misc nlp rstats gan ethics research dataviz survey python tool security kaggle video thought bayesian humour tensorflow w_code bias dataset pytorch cv tip application javascript forecast swift golang rl jax julia gnn causal surey diffusion
© Copyright Philosophy 2018 Site Template by Colorlib